Corporations and Public Health: Overview and Case Study of GE Healthcare: Most Admired Company or Foe of Public Health?

Authors

  • Martin Donohoe School of Community Health, Portland State University, USA
  • Claire Robinson GM Watch, United Kingdom

Keywords:

public health, social justice, ethics, corporations, activism, General Electric, pollution

Abstract

This article reviews the activities of GE Healthcare and its parent company, General Electric (ranked by Forbes Magazine in 2008 as the world's largest company), which have been antithetical to public health. These activities include unethical human subject experiments; environmental pollution; workers' rights and workplace health and safety violations; fraud; false and misleading advertising; sponsorship of corporate front groups; lobbying; a personal attack on a radiologist for exposing the risks of nephrogenic systemic sclerosis from its contrast agent Omniscan; and an ethically troubling technology transfer agreement with New York Presbyterian Hospital. Despite such activities, General Electric has been highly praised in the business community, including being named "America's Most Admired Company" in a Forbes Magazine poll and one of the "World's Most Respected Companies" in polls conducted by Barron's and Financial Times.

Published

2010-12-12

Issue

Section

Social Medicine in Practice