Crackland: Beyond Crack Cocaine
Keywords:Public Health, Drug Use, Crack Cocaine, Life History, Social Marginalization, Social Protection, Social Problems, Brazil
AbstractBackground: Crackland is a central deteriorated neighborhood in São Paulo city, Brazil, a market of crack cocaine where marginalized people live or circulate. Objective: This study aims to characterize the social reproduction of subjects who visit or live in Crackland; b) analyze the life trajectory of these persons. Methods: The study embraces the theoretical and methodological perspective of historical and dialectical materialism, considering drug consumption a complex social process. This is a qualitative case study, utilizing in-depth interviews with ten individuals, nine men and one woman, contacted by the snowball technique in Crackland. We collected the life histories of the individuals and a set of variables of social reproduction in order to compose the Social Reproduction Index (SRI) of the individuals’ families, allocating them to different social groups. Results: The results show that the individuals came from families with different SRI, and they came from various states of Brazil, having migrated for various reasons: threats to life, to escape imprisonment, political persecution and, especially, to seek better social conditions. With regard to drug use, seven reported using crack cocaine and other illicit drugs. People in Crackland are primarily exposed to impoverishment and marginalization processes; they also face lack of social protection. We conclude that the occupants of Crackland are part of the lumpen proletariat, being marginal to most institutional social protection. They develop self-defense strategies and survive by working in informal and sporadic jobs, being active in many ways and even providing for their families of origin. Conclusion: Crack cocaine use is a small part of that process. Instead of the effects of the drugs on the brain or individual subjectivity, the study brings to light the social issue as the central category for understanding the “social subjects” who constitutes Crackland.
Raupp L, Adorno RCF. [Crack usage circuits in the downtown area of the city of São Paulo (SP, Brazil)]. Cien Saude Colet. 2011.16 (5): 2613-2622.
Mosqueira TM. Renovation of the Light region - São Paulo History Center: urban projects and intervention strategies [thesis of master’s degree]. Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, University of São Paulo, 2007.
Frúgoli Jr H, Spaggiari E. [From crackland to junkies: ethnographic paths in the neighborhood of Luz]. Ponto URBE [Online], 2011(6).[cited 2016 Mar 5]. Available on: http://pontourbe.revues.org/1870
Schor SM, Vieira MAC. [Main results of the socioeconomic profile of the homeless in the downtown area of São Paulo], 2010. The Institute of Economic Research Foundation - Fipe. [cited 2016 Mar 5] Available on: http://www.defensoria.sp.gov.br/dpesp/Repositorio/31/Documentos/Principais%20Resultados%20do%20Perfil%20Socioecon%C3%B4mico%20da%20Popula%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20de%20Moradores%20de%20Rua.pdf
Varanda W, Adorno RCF. [Urban disposable: discussing the complexity of the homeless and the challenge for health policies]. Saude e Soc. 2004.13(1):56-69.
Bastos FI, Bertoni N. [National Survey on the use of crack: who are the users of crack and / or the like in Brazil? how many are in the state capitals?] Rio de Janeiro: Editora ICICT / FIOCRUZ. 2014. [cited 2016 Mar 5] Available on: http://www.arca.fiocruz.br/bitstream/icict/10019/2/UsoDeCrack.pdf
Rui T. [Usage of “Luz” and “cracolândia”: fieldwork of spatial practices]. Saude e soc. 2014; 23(1):91-104.
Wolff SFS. [Jardim América: the first neighborhood-Garden of São Paulo and its architecture]. São Paulo: EDUSP; 2015.
Soares CB. [Contemporaneous drug consumption and youth: the construction of the object on the grounds of collective health]. [habilitation thesis]. School of Nursing, University of São Paulo, 2007.
Silvia SM, Soares CB, Santos VE. An Evaluation of the Harm Reduction Unit in Santo André City, São Paulo State, Brazil. Social Medicine (Social Medicine Publication Group). 2010; 5(3): 161-167.
Netto JP. [Monopolist capitalism and social service]. São Paulo: Cortez; 2001.
Encyclopedia of Marxism. Available in: https://www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/e/s.htm#essence.
Aguiar ZN, Soares CB. The qualification of nursing attendants: transformations in work and life. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2004; 12 (4): 614-622.
Trapé CA. The measurement of social class in critical epidemiology: a proposal of approximation from the category of social reproduction [thesis]: School of Nursing, University of São Paulo. 2011.
Bardin L. [Content Analysis]. São Paulo: Livraria Martins Fontes; 1977.
Resolution nº 466, December 12, 2012. [Resolution on regulatory guidelines and standards for research involving human subjects]. Ministry of Health. Brasília. 2012 [cited 2016 Mar 5] Available on: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/cns/2013/res0466_12_12_2012.html
Engels F. [The Condition of the Working Class in England] (Trans. Schumann, B. A) São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial (Originally published work in 1845); 2008.
Stotz EN. [Poverty and Capitalism]. In Valla VV, Stotz EN, Algebaile EB, [Editors]. [To understand poverty in Brazil]. Rio de Janeiro: National Public Health School Sérgio Arouca. 2005: 53-72.
Maricato E. [Urbanism in the periphery of the globalized world: Brazilian cities]. São Paulo Perspec. 2000;4(14): 21-33.
Santos M. [For another globalization: the single thought to the universal consciousness]. (6th ed.) Rio de Janeiro: Record; 2001.
Davis M. [Planet of Slums]. (Trans. Medina B). São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial; 2006.
Viana N. [Capitalism: Full accumulation]. Aparecida: Santuário/Ideias & Letras; 2009.
Santos VE Soares CB. Psychoactive substance abuse from a collective health perspective: a reflection about social values and fetishism. Health & Social Change. (4) 2. 2013 38-54.
Castel R. [The Roads to Disaffiliation: Insecure Work and Vulnerable Relationships]. International Journal of Urban and Regional. 2000;24 (suppl. 3): 519-535.
Bourgois P. Crack and the political economy of social suffering. Addict Res Theory. 2003; 1(11): 31-37.
Boiteux L. O antimodelo brasileiro: proibicionismo, encarceramento e seletividade penal frente ao tráfico de drogas. Nueva Sociedad. 2015;Especial: 140-152.
Zoccatelli G. “It was fun, it was dangerous”: Heroin, young urbanities and opening reforms in China's borderlands. Int J Drug Policy. 2014;25(4): 762–768.