Propuesta de desobediencia civil organizada desde la medicina académica frente a la decisión del Tribunal Supremo en el caso Dobbs vs la Asociación de Salud de la Mujer de Jackson

Autores/as

Resumen

En respuesta a la crisis de atención médica de las mujeres solidificada por la decisión Dobbs de la Corte Suprema, luego de la cual la mitad de los estados podrían prohibir el aborto (y potencialmente la fertilización in vitro, la anticoncepción de emergencia e incluso el tratamiento para el embarazo ectópico y el aborto espontáneo parcial o “callejón”). ), la profesión médica ha respondido con declaraciones que condenan el fallo, marchas de protesta, agendas de investigación para estudiar las consecuencias (con resultados fácilmente predecibles en los próximos años que solo serán ignorados por los legisladores anticientíficos) y estableciendo soluciones alternativas (p. , barcos en alta mar, un moderno “ferrocarril de superficie”, etc.) para brindar servicios de aborto a quienes lo necesitan y/o lo desean.

Citas

Grossman G, Perritt J, Grady D. The Impending Crisis of Access to Safe Abortion Care in the US. JAMA Intern Med. 2022;182(8):793-795. Available at https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2793700.

News Release, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, July 7, 2022. More Than 75 Health Care Organizations Release Joint Statement in Opposition to Legislative Interference. Available at https://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2022/07/more-than-75-health-care-organizations-release-joint-statement-in-opposition-to-legislative-interference.

Brief of amici curiae American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Nursing, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association of Public Health Physicians, et al. in support of respondents, Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Association. 2021 (Sept 21). Available at https://reproductiverights.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Major-Medical-Groups-Amicus-Brief.pdf.

Donohoe MT. Complicit. Social Medicine 2020;13(1):1-7. Full text pdf available at https://www.socialmedicine.info/index.php/socialmedicine/article/view/1123 (and in Spanish at (https://www.medicinasocial.info/index.php/medicinasocial/article/view/1147).

Weber L, Barry-Jester AM. Conservative blocs unleash wave of litigation to curb public health powers. National Public Radio 2022 (July 18). Available at https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2022/07/18/1111766924/conservative-bloc-litigation.

Lehmann C. 10 new ways docs could face legal troubles post-Roe. Medscape Medical News 2022 (Aug 4). Available at https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/978631.

Donohoe M. Doctors Gone Bad: Physicians, Dictatorships, and Warrior Cultures. Social Medicine 2020:13(2):106-11. Available at https://www.socialmedicine.info/index.php/socialmedicine/article/view/1223/2213. Also available in Spanish at https://www.socialmedicine.info/index.php/medicinasocial/article/view/1221.

Vaniani R, Pitts A, Aurora P. Dismantling Structural Racism in the Academic Residency Clinic. N Engl J Med 2022; 386:2054-2058.

Wynia M. Civic Obligations in Medicine: Does "Professional" Civil Disobedience Tear, or Repair, the Basic Fabric of Society? AMA Virtual Mentor. January 2004, Volume 6, Number 1. Available at https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/sites/journalofethics.ama-assn.org/files/2018-07/pfor1-0401.pdf.

Donohoe MT, Schiff G. Call to Service: Social Justice Is a Public Health Issue (Physician activism and the doctor-patient relationship). AMA Virtual Mentor 2014 (September); 16(9):699-707. Available at https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/call-service-social-justice-public-health-issue/2014-09.

American Medical Association. Code of Medical Ethics Preface and Preamble. Available at https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/code-medical-ethics-preface-preamble.

Kim J. The end of Roe v. Wade has huge economic implications for male partners, too. National Public Radio 2022 (July 3). Available at https://www.npr.org/2022/06/27/1107715589/abortion-access-impact-on-men.

Center for Reproductive Rights. Women’s Health Protection Act (WHPA)

Federal Legislation to Protect the Right to Access Abortion Care. 2022 (Feb 28). Available at https://reproductiverights.org/the-womens-health-protection-act-federal-legislation-to-protect-the-right-to-access-abortion-care/.

Donohoe MT. Roles and responsibilities of health professionals in confronting the health consequences of environmental degradation and social injustice: education and activism. Monash Bioethics Review, 2008;27(Nos. 1 and 2):65-82.

Wiist W, Barker K, Arya N, Rohde J, Donohoe M, White S, Lubens P, Gorman G, Hagopian A. The role of public health in the prevention of war: rationale and competencies. Am J Publ Hlth 2014(6):e34-e47. Available at http://ajph.aphapublications.org/toc/ajph/104/6.

Vinekar K, Karlapudi A, Nathan L, Turk J, Rible Radhika, Steinauer Jody. Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs. Obstetrics & Gynecology: 2022 (April 27). Available at https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Fulltext/9900/Projected_Implications_of_Overturning_Roe_v_Wade.449.aspx.

Publicado

2023-03-30

Número

Sección

Temas y Debates